On 11/22/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah - Actually - That should be really easy to fix. We need a "quality controlled" Maven Repository that we ourselves populate and update.
ohhhh yes ! So if something gets updated on the Maven project,
we're insulated from it.
like if Maven was a bad virus :) Actually we don't care if something gets updated,
unless we have a bug that we know about and that we need fixed.
We should care a *lot* : this is what configuration management is all about ! We want to guarantee that the version x.y.z that use the plugin version A;B;C will still use this plugin version in 2 years. Then we pull the update and place it in
our repository. So we need to: Create the Repository
YESSSSS ! Host it (Alex? Da Haus?) The best solution would be to have a local file system based repo (but maven does not support it). Otherwize, I have a server on which we can put the repo, and das haus could be another one, and people.apache.org is another solution I guess I could host it as well as a backup....I'm
doing a controlled repository anyways... Reconfigure our Maven instances. Probably create our own maven installation, so that future contributers get a Maven install that works specifically for ADS.
Not sure to get what yyou mean. And provide an additional configuration tutorial in
case they already have Maven...
"they" = who ? --- Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey Guys, > > > > Maven has a project called Doxia. There's no doco > > yet... > > > No kidding ;) This is a maven project, buddy :) > > > </snip> > > > > <rant> > > hey, so far, we have serious maven problems, like > some plugins have been > updated and fucked up the build. > > I would say I'm pretty pissed off, because it's not > the first time. I just > consider that, so far, maven is definitively making > me loosing a hell of > time for *nothing*. > > And i'm not alone in this situation. > > > So, I would say one thing : unless we have fixed all > the maven iussue that > we do have, and make it solid rock and reliable, I > would say -1 to any more > plugins. And I'm very close to say +1 to ant and > ivy, if it wasn't a big > loss of time. > > But at a point, it may worth the time... > > Just make maven work like ant does, this is what we > need now. Is taht so > complicated ? (not talking about continuum which is > just a joke) > </rant> > > -- > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
-- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny
