--On Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:17 AM +0200 Emmanuel Lecharny
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:29 PM +0200 Emmanuel Lecharny
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, one that is not proprietary is of course desired.
This is why slamd seams a good tool. If its performance is bad, then
it's
up to the users to improve it. Version 2.0.0 seems promizing, with
another backend (BDB JE)
I use 2.0 checked out of CVS. ;) And I've got plenty of network
bandwidth at the moment (1GB between all systems). It certainly can
do what is necessary as long as I give it enough machines to do the
work. I'd just prefer to use fewer than I do now. ;)
Interesting. How does it compares to 1.8, so far ? Is it faster? (I agree
that everybody is not lucky enough to have as many server as google have
in his basement :)
It is definitely much faster in term of pulling up folders that have
hundreds of results in them. I don't see that the client interaction with
the LDAP server and the feeding back of results to the master slamd is any
faster. ;) The instability issues with the clients that I've encountered
from the start seem to remain, as well. Periodically one will just lock
up, and I'll have to restart an optimization job over, which can cost me
many hours of time. :/
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Senior Systems Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
