Tony Thompson a écrit :

On 3/30/07, Tony Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
Alex,
That does in fact work.  I can use that workaround so I don't have to
add my own schema extension.  Is that a recommended way to do things in
the directory?  I guess at this point I am really looking for guidance
on the "right" way to do things.
The 'ExtensibleObject' is, as mentionned by Alex, a workaround (sorry that I didn't mentionned it in my previous mail, it was out of my mind).

It would be better to decalre your own ObjectClass, and to include the member attribute in it. All your entries will then have to use this specific ObjectClass. I don't know if this is something you can do, but at least, you will be in control. Adding ExtensibleObject will allow your users to add absolutly any attributes to entries, and it can be dangerous.

Emmanuel

Reply via email to