I like that idea as well.

I'll get them all in the design guide.

Thanks,
- Ole



Alex Karasulu wrote:
Good idea Emmanuel.  Permit me to extend on this a bit ...

Perhaps instead of getting really long OIDs you can use instead compute a hashCode from the suffix and just concat that as the
least significant OID term.  For example:

1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.X.2.org.tuscany.das.ldap.config.DASConfig.baseDN

Can be the following valid OID if the hashCode for org.tuscany.das.ldap.config.DASConfig.baseDN is 123456:

1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.X.2.123456

WDYT?

Alex

On 4/5/07, *Ole Ersoy* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Emmanuel,

    Bottle of wine...in Amsterdam...Sooooooure :-)

    I think using ascii values is a great idea.
    I'll stick it in the design guide.

    Thanks,
    - Ole



    Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
     > Ole, David,
     >
     > when I woke up this morning, under my shower, I had the idea I missed
     > yesturday evening  due to the bottle of wine I drunk ... - : why
    don't
     > you use the ascii value of each character to code your OID,
    postfixing
     > your PEN ? Something like :
     >
    1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.X.2.org.tuscany.das.ldap.config.DASConfig.baseDN
     > will be transformed to :
     > 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.X.2 (the prefix, where X is a number)
     > .111.114.103.46. ... (111 = 'o', 114='r', 103='g', 46 = '.', etc)
     >
     > you will have very long OIDs, but this is not really a problem,
    and thy
     > will be unique worldwilde because the prefix is assigned to your
     > company, and you will have to manage the suffix (it's up to you
    to use
     > correct packages...)
     >
     >
     > On 4/5/07, *David Jencks* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
     > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
    wrote:
     >
     >     I would prefer to see a solution that mapped java objects to
    existing
     >     schemas, and perhaps has a way to generate schemas with oids,
    but it
     >     seems to me that autogeneration of something that is supposed
    to be
     >     worldwide unique and meaningful may cause more difficulties
    than it
     >     solves.
     >
     >
     > The worldwide OID will be enforced through the prefix (and
    management in
     > the project :)
     >
     >     For instance you'd need a way to reserve a unique PEN for each
     >     installation on which you wanted to run this stuff.
     >
     >
     > That's very true. But if you use ADS in a company,  then this
    company
     > should have a PEN (at least in theory: as there are only 28389
     > attributed PEN as of today ...).
     >
     >     dunno, I'm kinda a beginner.
     >
     >
     > you should be kidding ;)
     >
     >     thanks
     >     david jencks
     >
     >
     > Emmanuel
     >
     > --
     > Cordialement,
     > Emmanuel Lécharny
     > www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> < http://www.iktek.com>


Reply via email to