On 5/24/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... JDBM is empty, but we might use it (juts if we decide to extend JDBM features, and it's quite likely to happen)
It is trivial to add back and for now it is cruft.
src can be deleted I think. Let me check
Thanks.
Btw, did you read my mail about server.xml pb with your last SASL commit? It would be very appreciated if you can fix the pb I got this morning.
Yes, and I committed a fix soon after I got a chance to review email.
Although, we can't anymore build the server with IBM JVM, which is painfull as this is the JVM I'm using (it's really the fastest !). Can you find a way to fix it ? (I mean, a workaround would be good right now, a perfect solution can wait a few days :)
I am aware of the issue and will get around to it when I can.
Thos little pbs (it took me 30 mins to have a building and running server this morning) may generate a lot of mails from users, and if we can avoid such mails, this would be good for us !
You must know you are at least 8 hrs ahead of me. Since I thought we all follow "collective code ownership" you could have simply consulted with other members of the Directory project and disabled the server.xml protocols and the failing tests with the IBM JRE. Certainly Alex will disable failing tests, as he did with the AES-256 tests, and leave it for me to deal with when I get around to it. Enrique
