Chris Custine a écrit :
<snip/>
Sounds good and I hope you don't think I am shooting down your idea.
I do
think it is a good one but it just comes down to prioritization, time to
market (can't believe I just used this term on an OS mailing list :)
), and
the impact that will result. I do want to do it though but the when
and the
how is what I am concerned with.
No, I know you aren't shutting it down. I also think that some of the
features I am thinking about are crossing over into the IDM realm anyway
(delegated user management, custom user friendly screens, etc.), so thats
why I think it is a pretty big discussion. I just didn't want to leave
Ersin stranded on his first email since I had some similar ideas.
Guys, you both have really good ideas. So does Ersin. My personal
opinion is that having a Web UI + a RCP GUI would be the best solution.
But when I look at the schedule, that's a different story :)
Alex is right when he says that a configuration GUI is mainly used by
admins, which has almost all the wanted accesses on their computers. But
Chris is also right, because you have so many hurdles in front of you
when it comes to install an application on your computer in big
companies ... Plus the fact that asking for a new protocol and port
being allowed on the firewall can be simply impossible sometime...
Damn, this is a complex world !
What about slowing down the planet rotation speed to 48 hours ?
Emmanuel
