Well - It's really no big deal. We can leave it for later. I spent half a day
debugging this, because it's so bizarre. Honestly I cleaned out my maven
repository twice. Rebuilt ADS. Everything in my repository is fresh. As long
as the logging file is present, life is good.
There's definitely something going on though. Why does renaming a logging file
cause that exception? I'll put some simple instructions in the JIRA for
verification.
Cheers,
- Ole
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Here is the code where you have the exception :
/**
* Gets the String for the OID of this SchmeaObject.
*
* @return the OID of this SchmeaObject
*/
public String toString()
{
return "<" + oid + ", " + ( ( names == null ) || (
names.length == 0 ) ? "null" : names[0] ) + ">";
}
Line 320 is the "return blah..."
Look at it, it's directly taken from trunk, rel 529404, and tell me if
you can simply have a ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException here.
Trust me, we have fixed this bug, and this is not the code your are
testing, take it for granted.
I can spend 5 minutes on your test, but it will work on my computer,
at least it won't fail on line 320 if this class.
It's like in court : evidences of guilt should be brought by the
prosecutor, the defender should not proof his innocence ;)
Emmanuel
I may spend some time on your issue, but not right now... I'm pretty
busy atm. Better if you try to find where in your build you have a
pb...
On 6/15/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Emmanuel,
I already double checked all the things you are suspicious of.
Honestly. I have the tests running fine in the project. If I rename
the logging configuration file, that's the exception that's thrown.
It should take you roughly half a minute to verify.
Cheers,
- Ole
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Ersin Er a écrit :
>
>> [OT]
>>
>> Please keep Jira conversations in Jira, not on the dev list.
>
> Ersin, the JIRA has been closed, then repopened, but should be closed
> again, so I think this convo is better suited into the dev list,
> otherwise we will have a never ending JIRA :)
>
> IMHO.
>
