Ok, Thanks guys. There you go... Time to vote: [ ] +1 We should release a new version of Shared LDAP for the Studio 1.1release [ ] +/-0 Abstain [ ] -1 We should NOT release a new version of Shared LDAP for the Studio 1.1release
Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On Jan 21, 2008 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm waiting for the vote. This is just a good example why we need > separate subprojects. Hopefully, shared-ldap and shared-codec is not > part of another project ;) > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Absolutely just kick off the vote. Although this is not a sub-project > > in itself we can vote on it for release since other projects depend on > it. > > > > Studio has just as much a right to push "shared" code releases as does > > the server. > > > > Alex > > > > On Jan 21, 2008 11:07 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Hi Dev, > > > > As you know, we're in the middle of a Studio (whether it's a RC or > > not) and we're trying to fix as many bugs as possible. > > > > The issue DIRSTUDIO-266 (OpenLDAP schema files parser fails when > > DESC contains an empty string '') [1] depends on the Apache > > Directory Shared LDAP project. This project is mainly used by > > Apache Directory Server but also by Apache Directory Studio. > > > > As of now, the Studio project has been using this dependency as a > > SNAPSHOT release, compiling a newest version when a bug was fixed > > in the trunk of the project, as new releases of the Shared LDAP > > project only appear when there is a new release of the Apache > > Directory Server. > > > > I was wondering if it would make sense to release more often the > > Shared LDAP project, when either the Server or Studio projects > > need it for a release. > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Thanks, > > Pierre-Arnaud > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-266 > > > > > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
