Hi David, On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As (in my experience) most process bits of ASF stuff any docs you may find > are generally wrong and if you ask any collection of old-timers you get a > different answer from each. However there's been a lot of discussion on > legal-discuss recently and after a lot of prodding there seems to be > consensus that: > - all distribution units need LICENSE and NOTICE files > - expected svn checkout units form a "distribution" so need to include > LICENSE and NOTICE files > - all other LICENSE and NOTICE files can be generated or from svn > - each LICENSE and NOTICE file refers only to the contents of the > distribution unit, not anything such as required dependencies that might be > needed to use it. > Thanks. We comply with all these rules except for the inclusion of the LICENSE and NOTICE files at the SVN checkout root. I'm going to add them. > .../trunk and ..../branches/1.1.0 since those are what we expect people to > check out if they want to build it themselves. > Ok, I'm going to add them in both locations. I haven't had time to look at this branch. Is it built with maven? I'm not > sure if I'll have time to look soon. If you guys are confident that all the > artifacts have appropriate legal files and there are no snapshots in any > maven build (if used) I'm happy to change to +0. > Yeah, It is built with Maven. Here are the instructions to build Studio: http://directory.apache.org/studio/building.html Regards, Pierre-Arnaud
