Hi,

just a question : even if an entry contains the extensibleObject and referral objectClass with a ref attribute, we still expect the RDN to be one of the existing attribute in the entry, aren't we ?

For instance, the following entry is invalid :

dn: ou=RemoteUsers,ou=system
objectClass: top
objectClass: referral
objectClass: extensibleObject
ref: ldap://fermi:10389/ou=users,ou=system
ref: ldap://hertz:10389/ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
ref: ldap://maxwell:10389/ou=users,ou=system

when the following one is valid :

dn: ou=RemoteUsers,ou=system
objectClass: top
objectClass: referral
objectClass: extensibleObject
ref: ldap://fermi:10389/ou=users,ou=system
ref: ldap://hertz:10389/ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
ref: ldap://maxwell:10389/ou=users,ou=system
ou: RemoteUsers

(the 'ou' attribute exists in the second entry, not in the first one)

Thanks !

--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org


Reply via email to