[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12624280#action_12624280
]
Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1094:
-------------------------------------------
IMO it makes sense to have the user who performed the revert operation in the
modifiersName rather than restoring the attribute's old value. This way am
thinking that we can *actually* know who performed the revert operation.
wdyt?
> ChangeLog interfaces must be able to capture enough information to restore
> state of operational attributes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-1094
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1094
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Alex Karasulu
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The change log interfaces may need to capture more information to properly
> restore the state of operational attributes after applying reverse LDIF's.
> This operational attribute information cannot be stored in band with the LDIF
> since LDIFs cannot have all operational attributes in them since most must be
> managed directly by the server.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
