+1 Same comment as Kiran. Pierre-Arnaud
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:12 PM, ayyagarikiran <ayyagariki...@gmail.com>wrote: > > SchemaObject sounds good to me, SchemaEntity is 'ok' but but sounds more > like another Entry ;) > > Kiran Ayyagari > > > Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just to avoid using different names for the same element, can we agree on >> a unique name for what is called SchemaObject/SchemaEntity/SchemaElement ? >> >> Right now, I'm mainly using SchemaObject in the server, but frankly, I >> think that SchemaEntity fits better (SchemaElement is too vague IMO). >> >> wdyt ? >> >>
