On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this modifications storing feature even working? > From what I've seen in the code, it looks more like a placeholder and the > feature is still waiting for implementation... > I couldn't find where Studio was depending on it, Kiran. Can you give me > some pointers, please? I remember Seelmann mentioning on ML that studio depends on this DN to update the cached schema, but this feature is not working due to an issue on server ( I believe it was working at one point of time but was broken later)
> Thanks, > Pierre-Arnaud > > On 6 juil. 2011, at 23:15, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > > had thought about this earlier but studio depends on this DN so didn't do > that, now is perhaps the right time to do it for version 2.0 of both > > On 07-Jul-2011 12:34 AM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/6/11 7:49 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >> >> hello guys, >> >> We currently have an entry with DN cn... > > IMO, the best would be to have a special AT injected into the ou=schema > entry, instead of having a dedicated entry to store the very same > information. It would solve the issue quite efficientely. > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > > > > -- Kiran Ayyagari
