On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Last, not least, we need to improve the kerberos documentation. Many > users > > complain about it. The truth is that we fixed some blocking issues those > > last weeks, bugs that were killing our implementation as a valid > candidate > > for a production kerberos server. But bugs are bugs, we can fix them. > OTOH, > > with a pathetic documentation, we can't expect to have users testing the > > kerberos server, and giving us some feedback about problems they found in > > the code. Sadly, we need some workforce to deal with this problem... > > I totally agree with that point. I played with Kerberos the last weeks > so I see it as my duty to contribute some documentation. But I'm > unsure what documentation system we should use. Felix did a great job > and moved all confluence pages to Docbook. But I know that at least > you (sorry, I won't blame you ;-) don't like Docbook XML. So should we > switch back to confluence? > > The nice thing about docbook is that always us to generate any target and manipulate formats with style sheets. I think it's idea even though it's heavy. We just need a nice tool that allows us to edit docbook in a WYSIWYG editor. This way one need not deal with XML directly. Alex
