On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi guys, > > a few months ago, I tried to get rid of reverse index, but the effort was > doomed, as I discovered that we really badly needed them in some cases (like > the sub-level or one-level index). > > If we get rid of one-level/sub-level index, then I do think we don't > anymore need the reverse index. > > I still have to think a bit more about the alias index, and the impact on > the code if we remove the reverse index. > > Just wanted to bring some light on this matter again. > > Note : removing the reverse index will lead to a major speed improvement in > additions or modifications, as we will only have one table to update, > instead of two... > > Absolutely. It will almost double performance without caching. -- Best Regards, -- Alex
