Le 8/1/13 1:32 PM, Alex Karasulu a écrit : > +1 > > Great job guys this is a true advance!
Regarding the performances we get with JDBM, I would say I was really disapointed. I remember we have made some perf test 3 years ago with SLAMD, and get up to 13 000 search/s, so getting down to 506/s with JDBM is just really really bad. Now, the server has been heavily modified to protect the database against concurrent modifications, and that forces us to add locks and to use a journal and transactions in JDBM. This has certainly slowed down the server a lot, but still, I would like to run the exact same tests with older versions (I have all of them since 1.5.0 installed on an old machine). Will do that next week. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
