[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-114:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-RC1
> Reconsider interfaces and base classes for Registries
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRAPI-114
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-114
> Project: Directory Client API
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alex Karasulu
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
>
>
> Previously the registries were specifically used by the DS but now they must
> be used by both studio and the LDAP API. The DS demands strict handling of
> various schema object dependencies while Studio does not and requires relaxed
> usage. The LDAP API will have further requirements perhaps, perhaps not.
> However a couple semantic handling requirements were introduced into the
> Registries to make them handle these various cases (relaxed verses strict
> usage). Rather than leaving these semantics in a single implementation we
> should instead reconsider splitting the implementation and re-exposing
> interfaces to use different implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
