On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 24/04/15 08:06, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > > On 04/23/2015 05:01 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> we have now a few more active projects, and I'm wondering if it's not > >> time to request more mailong lists for them. More specifcially, it seems > >> like those mailing list would be good to have : > >> - studio-dev > >> - kerby-dev > >> - fortress-dev > >> > >> That would make it easier for us, don't you think so ? > > +1 for Kerby, there is very much activity > > > > +0 for Fortress, I think it is still connected to the rest, it also > > depends on LDAP API and uses ApacheDS libs. > > There is already a fortress ML, which is targetting users and dev. We > can move all fortress mails to this existing ML, no urgent need for a > fortress-dev atm. > > > > > I don't think we need it for Studio, there has already been more > > activity in the past. > > Ok. > > Kiran, I don't think we need a formal vote to create a kerby ML. Should > we consider that this is the only ML we need atm ? > I don't think we need a vote, and yes a ML for Kerby is all we need now. -- Kiran Ayyagari http://keydap.com
