+1 Best regards,
Pierre On Sunday, June 26, 2016, SHAWN E SMITH <se...@psu.edu> wrote: > Hi Kai, > > All fair questions. Our initial efforts in the SCIM spectrum was an > offshoot of eSCIMo, with the primary work being done by Steve Moyer. Once > the spec was finalized we did a first principles redesign in an attempt to > make a fully compliant library implementation. This effort was to support > an identity system that we've built and are running. The identity system > is built out from many Apache directory components; Fortress for RBAC/ABAC, > and the LDAP API to be specific. We're watching the Kerby work anxiously > because it will allow me to retire a C++ shim service I wrote for doing > Kerberos administrative tasks. > > I think the Directory project has all of the tools to build out a first > class identity solution and I'm hoping our SCIM implementation will be a > natural fit to the existing tool set. > > Thanks again for the consideration. > > Shawn > > "The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff. > He builds his castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the > imagination." > — Fred Brooks > > Shawn Smith > Director of Software Engineering > Administrative Information Services > Penn State University > 814-321-5227 > se...@psu.edu <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','se...@psu.edu');> > > https://keybase.io/ussmith > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Zheng, Kai" <kai.zh...@intel.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kai.zh...@intel.com');>> > *To: *"Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@directory.apache.org');>> > *Sent: *Saturday, June 25, 2016 1:21:21 PM > *Subject: *RE: [Vote] Accept Scim contribution > > I would love to see the eSCIMo component being revived and the two similar > projects being consolidated. Considering the place holder is ready there, > we could probably trust the party and give them the space to develop in the > direction, without too much overhead incurred to the left of us I guess. > > > > However, I have some questions to have to ask. Why is Apache Directory a > natural place for the guys to consider contributing the project to? How is > it linked with the other components? What’s the rational? Sorry I may have > missed some discussions before. > > > > +1 on the vote once above questions are addressed. Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Kai > > > > *From:* Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:kayyag...@apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kayyag...@apache.org');>] > *Sent:* Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:30 PM > *To:* Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@directory.apache.org');>> > *Subject:* Re: [Vote] Accept Scim contribution > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','elecha...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > two months ago, Shawn Smith wrote us to inform the Apache Directory > project that he wanted to contribute the project he is working on with > Steve Moyer, Christopher Harm and Alex Haskell. > > > We have discussed about this proposal one month ago, but due to some > highly busy agenda on my side, I sadly forgot to start a vote (and I > have to be frank : would have I started the vote, I would not have had > teh time to deal with the consequences of a positive vote). Now that I'm > done with teh API and ApacheDS releae, and my work on the API branch, my > agenda has cleared up. > > > So here is a formal vote for the integration of this project in the > apache Directory project, as a sub project. My opinion is that this > would replace eSCIMo that has never been released, unless Kiran decide > otherwise. We would naturally use the existing eSCIMo project web-site > as a plcae-holder. One idea would also be that we could keep the eSCIMo > name, or use SCIMple-Identity, but it would be really up to the people > to decide. > > I am fine with using eSCIMo name and site > > > If we get a positive vote, we will then have to vote the 4 people who > participated to the code as committer - if they want to pursue their > work, of course ! -. But first, let's vote > > > [ ] +1, accept the SCIMple-Identity project as a subproject of Apache > Directory > > +1, however I may not be able to spend time on this cause of the work I am > > doing on another SCIM server (written in Go) and other paid work. > > > [ ] +/-0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 : don't accept the SCIMple-Identity project. > > > For the record, the code base is available at > https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity, and it's already under a > AL 2.0 license > (https://github.com/PennState/SCIMple-Identity/blob/develop/LICENSE) > > Many thanks, and trully sorry fo rthe delayed vote ! > > Thank you > > Kiran Ayyagari > > http://keydap.com > > -- Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
