[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRAPI-318.
--------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
The hashcode is now computed on any change made on a SchemaObject.
The {{readOnly}} flag has been removed, it's useless.
> Schema elements HashCode are not computed at all
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRAPI-318
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-318
> Project: Directory Client API
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0.AM1
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0.AM2
>
>
> The {{SchemaObject}} sub-classes hashCode is never computed, unless the
> {{lock()}} method is called.
> The {{lock()}} method is used to compute this value, but them the object
> isn't mutable anymore. This is ok for the un-mutable flavor, not at all for
> the mutable one, as any attempt to update them will result in a
> {{UnsupportedOperationException}} being thrown, like in :
> {code:java}
> public void setMayAttributeTypeOids( List<String> mayAttributeTypeOids )
> {
> if ( locked )
> {
> throw new UnsupportedOperationException( I18n.err(
> I18n.ERR_13700_CANNOT_MODIFY_LOCKED_SCHEMA_OBJECT, getName() ) );
> }
> if ( !isReadOnly )
> {
> this.mayAttributeTypeOids = mayAttributeTypeOids;
> }
> }
> {code}
> The idea behind not computing teh hashCode on the fly was to speedup the use
> of this class, which is frequently stored in {{Map}} or {{Set}}. The problem
> is that the {{lock()}} method must now be called explicitly *outside* the
> class, which is clearly painful.
> The direct consequence if the {{lock()}} method is not called is that *ALL*
> the {{SchemaElement}} instances will have a hashCode value of {{0}}, making
> the access from a {{Set}}/{{Map}} quite expensive :/
> To add insult to injury, you simply can't call {{lock()}} on a mutable
> version, as it will forbid you to update the object unless you unlock it
> before. Beautiful :/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)