[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16749162#comment-16749162
 ] 

Chris Poulsen commented on FC-263:
----------------------------------

Thanks, since switching to gradle I have been hit by a couple of places where 
maven seems way more lenient with respect to what it accepts. Though I did not 
expect it to accept invalid xml.

We still have a good amount of work left on other parts of our software before 
the permission server can not be postponed anymore, so I guess that waiting for 
next release is not going to cause us any major grief. (And as a work-around I 
could use a version with the fixed pom from our local maven repository, while 
waiting for the release).

> Unable to resolve maven dependencies for fortress-core v2.0.3
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FC-263
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-263
>             Project: FORTRESS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: gradle
>            Reporter: Chris Poulsen
>            Assignee: Shawn McKinney
>            Priority: Major
>
> fortress-core depends on org.openldap:accelerator-(api|impl):1.0-RC41
> which in turn has a parent: org-openldap:accelerator:1.0-RC41
> The parent pom is invalid xml, due to some crap before the <?xml?> entry 
> (Content not allowed in prolog).
> Artifact link: 
> [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.openldap/accelerator/1.0-RC41] 
> Direct pom link: 
> [http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/openldap/accelerator/1.0-RC41/accelerator-1.0-RC41.pom]
> That dependency has been broken since ultimo 2015 how can that be possible, 
> are no one actually compiling against the released stuff?
> It seems that the 1.0-RC40 pom is valid, but is it safe to use that as a 
> replacement? The endless series of RC releases does not exactly inspire 
> confidence (or indicate that fortress-core itself is mature/stable due to 
> non-released dependencies)
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to