bdemers commented on code in PR #213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-scimple/pull/213#discussion_r1060871770
##########
scim-core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/scim/core/repository/ObjectMapperProvider.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+package org.apache.directory.scim.core.repository;
+
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.AnnotationIntrospector;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationFeature;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.AnnotationIntrospectorPair;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.JacksonAnnotationIntrospector;
+import
com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jakarta.xmlbind.JakartaXmlBindAnnotationIntrospector;
+import
com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jakarta.xmlbind.JakartaXmlBindAnnotationModule;
+
+public class ObjectMapperProvider {
Review Comment:
I recently refactored some of the JSON/ObjectMapper bits.
I'm not 100% that will help with this usage, but it is something we can
investigate.
https://github.com/apache/directory-scimple/blob/develop/scim-core/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/scim/core/json/ObjectMapperFactory.java
This _may_ come into play when dealing with patches that contain values from
SCIM Extensions.
That said, with your approach using `objectAsMap` it _may_ not make a
difference.
(Mostly a note to myself, to go back and look at the ObjectMapper-related
bits 😄)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@directory.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@directory.apache.org
