Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up? - KN
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says: >> > >> > On Repackaging >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under >> the >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD >> to >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar. >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider >> > carefully how they will approach this transition. >> > >> > >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way >> > applications written against the early release will have the right >> > namespace already. >> > >> > -Flavio >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release? >> > > >> > > - Sijie >> > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to >> under >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors? >> > >> >> > >> - Sijie >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
