Good question.  Like firefox they both require forklift upgrades
instead of a patch file. What gives?



On 1/30/06, Adrian Macneil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well IMO we should just scrap the whole download page and give users a
> language choice, then provide them with a small (<500kb) downloader that can
> handle all the mirrors and connect to at least one p2p network for maximum
> speed. This would simplify everything. And we could still provide links for
> those that want non-windows operating systems or an offline install (because
> it's the windows downloads that are mainly causing the server overloads
> anyway). But this should probably be integrated with automated updates, and
> I think maybe we need to approach sun about using the same system that jre
> 1.5 uses, which I think would suit openoffice.
>
> On 31/01/06, kieran mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am sorry I meant the current open office page is not based on php to
> > push the link.
> >
> > Jut take links off of your page and sent it to them and t would be
> > handled like their download links.
> >
> > Thanks
> > KM
> >
> > On 1/30/06, Mike! <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > On Monday 30 January 2006 02:30, kieran mullen wrote:
> > > > Why would you need php when the existing download page doesnt require
> > > > one? They are pushing a file based in the url... correct me if I am
> > > > wrong.. but isnt that all you are doing with the torrent file?
> > >
> > > The current torrent downloads page is auto generated using a php script,
> which
> > > generates the required js arrays. This requires much less maintenance,
> then
> > > doing it by hand, everytime a new archive is added, or one is dropped.
> > > Unfortunately, the OOo server doesn't allow for php code. Furthermore,
> in
> > > times of high demand, the OOo server is useually swamped with http
> requests,
> > > even when most of the content is static. So this is a nasty problem :)
> > >
> > > As for the integration, that would be possible, but that would add an
> extra
> > > option to the downloads selection menu (namely the type of download). I
> > > wonder, whether that would no over complicate the download process for
> the
> > > average user...
> > >
> > > OTOH, you are quite right about the bandwidth-saving-advantages of using
> > > bittorrent, so we should promote it as much as possible, especially in
> times
> > > of very high demand on our mirror network.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to