Hi Steffen, On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:51:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
sorry to say, but your reportr is quite useless to me. > a regular download is far quicker than going through P2P and I do not grasp > why that is. Not for me. OOo BT downloads always maxed out my line so far. (OTOH I only have a 2000/256 ADSL line) > Presuming that regular FTP request are dealt with the same > priority as one coming through P2P, the bandwidth should be kind of > comparable, shouldn't it? Of course it should. And I regularily see peers that download at more than 500KB/s > P2P should with many prior downloads in my > neighbourhood only possibly support a far superior download. "neighbourhood"? So you're not speeking of Bittorrent apparently? > But from what I > observe it rather fails to come only close to it .... Well, you should at least mention what network you're talking about and what file you were trying to download. > I thought that if OOo would have many clients itself operating, then the > situation should improve. Is this wrong? It is wrong, because OOo istelf is not a p2p client. If one has OOo isntalled that doesn't make OOo send itself out to the world.. The user who downloads OOo must keep the dowload alive. To answer the question from the subject (please always state everything in the body again) on how many Peers are there: For BitTorrent, there are 2-4 permanent server-seeds (depending on the file) and then the users who are downloading OOo/keep seeding... ciao Christian -- NP: Deftones - Mx (Hidden Track) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
