-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

BitTorrent on its own already does multi parallel segmented downloads,
but it does so in a less abusive manner already, only opening one
datastream per source. Additionally, each downloader that is
participating is also available to be a partial mirror while
downloading, and a complete mirror once complete.

Every time someone tries to be vocal about MetaLink, it makes me want to
use them less and less.

Francois Petillon wrote:
| Anthony Bryan wrote:
|> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalink for more info.
|
| "For fast Internet connections, it also speeds up the process by
| allowing chunks/segments of each file to be downloaded from multiple
| resources at the same time (segmented downloading)".
|
| Parallel segmented downloads are anti-social (if you have to speed up
| the download, it means there is a bottleneck somewhere, either on
| network or on server, and by increasing the number of connections you
| simply steal bandwidth/ressources from others people) and a waste of
| server ressources. I just do not care about metalinks by itself but you
| do promote that kind of abusive use.
|
| François
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBSGy5MF8nceBm0DUaAQKv5wgAg2I6ktUSLl3l4dpHO/5AdUv0ge3J1ezs
kjtAcEcmqfyXuD1+K8N1njtnpC3OeZer9hCMbij+2NHZz24SVLSCABCmnVgeKr74
yAZiVaMBnz1l12le/xQdGdrCaNzsR3OkE6yjTDhOYzIhdqCyMQBB0r1t46HoRZHX
ElrSIjIuryOe8hoOiFAvz9rF42sVFQXpstdyfJOtK3Vim018zPV6S5/iCGzKofnG
iPBDulXktmCeDWnTTDVfoOT3qfNN4rFx4hir6se7TzPGIAaQxs/EO8qAiX9VFUnr
qP4yY7Ho5WXimh/1X38bc7LOFluJ0Rv06Je/hd53NMnPSLTmwq6OZw==
=ZMij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to