Alex Fisher wrote:
Hi Ed,
of course it will as Intel and AMD CPUs are compatible to each other. :-)
BTW:
Any suggestion to show this in the column without to enlarge it too
much? Please note that it has than to fit also for the Linux columns.
TBH, I fail to understand why the devs feel it necessary to call it "Windows-
Intel". The inclusion of "Intel" is totally redundant - I have heard of
Windows for ARM, but it seems only a rumour. Every Windows box (and laptop)
I've ever seen ran on x86 hardware. Couple that with the fact that there is no
Windows-ARM port of OO.o, and those machines which might use Win-ARM would
probably not be able to run OO.o anyhow, I can see no good or valid reason not
to simply call it "OO.o for Windows [32 or 64]).
I agree with Alex on this. To those that are "new" to computers it
is/can be confusing, the original message show this.
Andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@distribution.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@distribution.openoffice.org
