At one point, Slavery was legal. At one point colonialism was legal and still is. At one point women not been allowed to vote was legal and a core principle in some countries.
Right now as we speak, war is legal. Is that correct? Does that make it right or correct? Maybe these examples and analogies are far fetched and off topic but that may trigger some thoughts. On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:45 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Not sure how you can say that considering the links I showed. Are you > saying that I, and Ross, and Dirk, and Greg, and Brett, and Phil, and > Shane, and et.al.... are all mistaken? How many more do you need?... Heck, > it's even in a press release: > > > https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/26/1767348/0/en/The-Apache-Software-Foundation-Celebrates-20-Years-of-Community-led-Development-The-Apache-Way.html > > "The ASF does not pay for development: thousands of committed > individuals help make a difference to the lives of billions of people by > ensuring that Apache software remains accessible to all." > > How about: > > https://community.apache.org/newbiefaq.html > > https://medium.com/@shanecurcuru/how-apache-really-works-995a091a72d3 > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html > > It is clear as day, except for those who find it convenient to ignore it > or "blur" it. > > On 2019/06/27 18:18:31, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:10 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > [snip] > > > > I'll just note that the new subject line is factually incorrect. What > > is correct is considerably more nuanced, and perhaps not widely > > understood. > > > > - Sam Ruby > > >
