In response to your claim to ignorance of the new faq directory:
http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=2670 Again, you avoid my direct question, by taking the focus off the point, by masking it with one small chunk of time. My question is: *Why won't you use, add to, nor address the site_maintainer's directory?* You would know about it because I brought it up for discussion on the main mail list for the project: http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=1700217 http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=1793654 You would know because of all the emails sent to the CVS mail list each time work was added. You would know work is occurring because of emails sent to the list in issue reports. You would know because you are project leads, and as project leads you watch the actions that occur at the project. You would know because the directory exists in CVS, next to the new one Ger created in the FAQ directory. If one was adding new faqs, it seems most natural that a scan of existing directories would occur for a fit, before a new directory is created. I *do* want to drop this argument, but I will continue to stick up for myself when you continue to show that I have not let you know that this work is there. I claim that between my actions and the actions of the system tools, all is right there, in the open, for all to see. If you folks are too busy to monitor these things, so that you can participate in a way that is fair to all contributors, perhaps you should step down and let others lead the project. Sincerely, Diane Mackay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
