New task type just for sleeping is not recommended to add, which makes no 
sense. 
I thinks this is unreasonable . So don't merge into dev branch !!!


On 2020/6/4, 13:09, "boyi" <[email protected]> wrote:

    HI:


    I choose the second one. It's the same as the normal task type
    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/4/2020 11:38,leon bao<[email protected]> wrote:
    @boyi
    i understand what you need, but how we implement your feature?
    now we have two ways to run the task:
    1. logic task run on master(sub work flow/ conditions / dependent)
    2. real task run on worker (shell / python / sql / mr / spark... )

    which way used for this task?

    huangming <[email protected]> 于2020年6月3日周三 下午3:59写道:

    look forward to“value passing”



    huangming

    From: boyi
    Date: 2020-06-03 15:54
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: New task type
    hi:


    We have a requirement that Party A requires the task to be performed 30
    minutes apart before the request can be performed again to obtain data ..




    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/3/2020 15:41,wu shaoj<[email protected]> wrote:
    Task 3 has no way to know when task 2 will be finished
    Why ? It's strange

    On 2020/6/3, 15:17, "boyi" <[email protected]> wrote:

    hi:


    o(╥﹏╥)o


    It is mainly used for some specific scenes,






    For example, task processing is not performed in the order of 1, 2, 3 and 4


    For example, there is a gap between task 2 and task 3,


    Task 3 has no way to know when task 2 will be finished


    You can only wait by sleeping






    In the new requirement, there is PR of "value passing". If it is
    implemented, it can be modified appropriately




    ---------------------------


    主要是用于一些特定场景,


    比如: 任务处理 并不是  按1,2,3,4 的顺序依次执行.
    比如 任务2和 任务3 之间存在间断,
    任务3没有办法知道任务2什么时候执行完.
    只能通过休眠的方式进行等待.


    新的需求里面,有"值传递"的PR, 这个如果实现了,就可以再做适当的修改.








    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/3/2020 15:03,wu shaoj<[email protected]> wrote:
    Wow ,can't aggree with you more.
    Keeping simple is so simple truth and so hard to pratice


    On 2020/6/3, 15:00, "boyi" <[email protected]> wrote:

    hi:


    Currently, support is not recommended. Keep it simple
    After the subsequent "value passing" requirements are implemented, or "if
    else task" is used for support


    ———


    当前不建议支持.保持简单.
    后续 "值传递"需求实现后,或者使用 " if-else task " 进行支持.








    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/3/2020 14:11,huangming<[email protected]> wrote:
    Such as an HTTP interface or a file or a database field



    huangming

    From: boyi
    Date: 2020-06-03 13:57
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: New task type
    hi:




    Can you give me an example??


    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/3/2020 13:53,huangming<[email protected]> wrote:
    Can you add the logic to check a condition before deciding whether to sleep

    是否可以加入检查某个条件不满足再休眠的逻辑



    huangming

    From: boyi
    Date: 2020-06-03 13:42
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re:New task type
    hi:

    In my project, I need a task node type, which can sleep for a specified
    time, and then continue to perform subsequent tasks



    If necessary, I will commit the dev branch



    As shown in the figure




    --------------------------------------
    BoYi ZhangE-mail : [email protected]
    On 06/3/2020 13:39,boyi<[email protected]> wrote:
    hi:


    在我的项目中,需要一种任务节点类型, 可以休眠指定的时间.然后继续执行后续任务.

    如果需要的话,我将会提交的dev分支.

    如图







    --
    DolphinScheduler(Incubator)  PPMC
    BaoLiang 鲍亮
    [email protected]

Reply via email to