Hi, I think you have misunderstood. In fact, the weighted smooth polling 
algorithm is also suitable for scenarios where no weight is set.

Best  wishes!
CalvinKirs

On 2020/07/19 03:13:10, "Yichao Yang" <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I got your point.
> 
> 
> I agree with your about the all algorithms you mentioned should be measured 
> by weight. But I think we should keep the original algorithm which is not 
> based on weight selection. and the algorithm based on weight should appear in 
> a new algorithm.
> 
> 
> In my opinion. Actually in our production environment, there are few 
> differences in the performance of the machines as you mentioned. In most 
> cases, the machine performance and configuration are consistent in our 
> production environment.
> 
> 
> So there are two scenarios for this weight based algorithm. The first one is 
> the one you mentioned. The second may occur when a user wants to use half of 
> the performance of machine A, rather than full use of machine A.
> 
> 
> So is it better to keep the original algorithm and also provide those new 
> selection algorithms based on weight?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best,
> Yichao Yang
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人:                                                                          
>                                               "dev"                           
>                                                          
> <[email protected]>;
> 发送时间: 2020年7月18日(星期六) 晚上10:12
> 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>;
> 
> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS]Load balancing weight
> 
> 
> 
> Let me give an example. It might be better. Suppose my computer A has twice
> the processing power of computer B. Then I have three tasks. According to
> the polling algorithm, A will handle two and B will handle one. Isn't our
> purpose of load balancing to make each machine work evenly?
> 
> Best  wishes!
>  CalvinKirs>
> 
> On 2020/07/18 13:56:38, lidong dai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have a little confused about adding a weight to what you said, like>
> > assign tasks to machines in turn, there is normally no weights>
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards>
> > --------------->
> > DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC>
> > Lidong Dai 代立冬>
> > [email protected]>
> > --------------->
> >
> >
> > CalvinKirs <[email protected]> 于2020年7月18日周六 下午5:55写道:>
> >
> > > Hi, everyone. I’m currently designing weight-based load balancing. My>
> > > point of view is that all load balancing needs to be done based on
> weights,>
> > > because load actually means that machines with good performance are>
> > > expected to handle more tasks. Therefore, weights should be Reflected
> in>
> > > each load balancing algorithm, it should be a default attribute in
> load>
> > > balancing.>
> > >>
> > > Hope to get your suggestions.>
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Best  wishes!>
> > > CalvinKirs>
> > >>
> > >>
> >

Reply via email to