Rather than deleting them directly, maybe we can mark some infrequently used and unmaintained data sources as unmaintained in official website documents and code.
This avoids potential problems caused by direct deletion, and we do not need to continue investing in maintaining these data sources. Best Regards, Rick Cheng On 2024/04/17 08:15:50 SbloodyS wrote: > Hello, > > We currently have seven inactive datasource plugin which have been > stale for one more years and never really has commits. Yet from time to > time, we need to answer users about what they are and how we are going > to make progress there. > > Therefore, I suggest we delete them unless there are maintainers willing > to maintain them. > > dolphinscheduler-datasource-dameng > dolphinscheduler-datasource-databend > dolphinscheduler-datasource-snowflake > dolphinscheduler-datasource-hana > dolphinscheduler-datasource-vertica > dolphinscheduler-datasource-redshift > dolphinscheduler-datasource-athena > > Thanks : ) > > > -- > Best Wishes > ZiHao >
