On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:46:02 +0200 Antti Kantee <pooka at iki.fi> wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 19:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Already done several times before. > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/ > > https://code.google.com/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space/ > > http://www.ohloh.net/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space > > http://www.ioremap.net/projects/unetstack > > http://www.joerch.org/tcpip/ > > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.167.2757 > > I'm aware of the paper you linked given that I wrote it. I don't agree > that it supports your claim "already done several times before". I was more worried about multiple different TCP-IP stacks that seem to be only used by small number of people and not maintained. Doing full TCP/IP is hard, and there are lots of features inside. It would be great to have one that is well supported and maintained.
