Hi Thomas, >>Please, keep us informed about the needed PF patch.
First of all, where and how should I post the patch to PF driver? And secondly I have only 82599, so I cannot run test for 82598 and X540. Is it possible that you could test on different NIC? thx & rgds, -ql On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: > 21/10/2013 16:11, Qinglai Xiao : >> Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to >> different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to >> get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it. >> >> Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully >> support mailbox message IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES. The service routine >> for IXGBE_VF_GET_QUEUES must be fixed, otherwise PF always return >> 1 as Tx/Rx queue number. >> >> [1] See section 7.2.1.2.1, 7.1.2.2 and 7.10.2.7.2 of Intel 82599 10 >> Gbe Controller Datasheet. >> >> Signed-off-by: Qinglai Xiao <jigsaw at gmail.com> > > Acked and applied with light modifications: > > - * Must let PF know we are at mailbox API 11 level. > + * Must let PF know we are at mailbox API version 1.1. > >> +} >> + >> + >> /* >> * Virtual Function device init > > Only 1 empty line is sufficient here. > > Thanks for your patch. > Please, keep us informed about the needed PF patch. > -- > Thomas
