> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wodkowski, PawelX > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 4:05 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration > > Hi, > I am wondering if there is a sense in having different configuration in for > RX and > TX mode in SR-IOV mode. Ex RX mode ETH_MQ_RX_NONE and TX mode > ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_DCB or something similar. > I am asking because in code there is no difference between number of RX > queues and TX queues reported to VF and if having different configuration in > RX > and TX is possible this must be taken into account. > Pawe? W?dkowski > Sii Engineer > Delivering outsourced services to Intel
Hi Pawel Though I am not sure if understood your question, I am trying to give some comments. Do you mean the configurable number of rx/tx queues in VF? For Niantic, hardware just supports only one queue in VF, so there is no flexibility for that. For later NICs like i40e, we will have that flexibility. Regards, Helin
