There is a bug in querying reta, of storing the data to the correct entry.
Code changes is straightforward for this bug.
Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang at intel.com>
---
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
v2 changes:
* Added the fix for the same issue in i40e VF driver.
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
index 899cb42..008d62c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -1924,7 +1924,7 @@ i40e_dev_rss_reta_query(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
lut = I40E_READ_REG(hw, I40E_PFQF_HLUT(i >> 2));
for (j = 0; j < I40E_4_BIT_WIDTH; j++) {
if (mask & (0x1 << j))
- reta_conf[idx].reta[shift] = ((lut >>
+ reta_conf[idx].reta[shift + j] = ((lut >>
(CHAR_BIT * j)) & I40E_8_BIT_MASK);
}
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
index 7ef7d58..fe46cf1 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ i40evf_dev_rss_reta_query(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
lut = I40E_READ_REG(hw, I40E_VFQF_HLUT(i >> 2));
for (j = 0; j < I40E_4_BIT_WIDTH; j++) {
if (mask & (0x1 << j))
- reta_conf[idx].reta[shift] =
+ reta_conf[idx].reta[shift + j] =
((lut >> (CHAR_BIT * j)) &
I40E_8_BIT_MASK);
}
--
1.9.3
