On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > for RPM-based distributions. > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions. > But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions > having different API/ABI for different applications: > - dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking > - extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking. > When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler. > > I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration > in Linux distributions. > > Changes since v1: > - name of .spec file match package name > - version in package name > - no static library > - ldconfig/depmod in scriplets > > Thanks for your comments/reviews. > -- > Thomas >
I understand that this is holding up the 1.6.0r2 release, as well as the 1.7.0 integration. As such, given that my concerns, while valid IMO, aren't required for the release: Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
