2014-11-17 06:19, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2014-11-13 06:14, Neil Horman: > > > Do you have an example set of tests that the other pmd's have followed > > > for this? > > > > You can check this: > > http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/tree/test_plans/pmd_test_plan.rst > > > > http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/tree/test_plans/pmd_bonded_test_plan.rst > > > Looking at this, the pmd_test_plan above seems perfectly applicable to Johns > pmd. did you feel as though additional tests were needed for a virutal pmd > (asside from a note describing the additional --vdev parameter required for > virtual device setup?
It's maybe sufficient. I didn't dig enough. We'll see wether some people need more for validation. > I'll have a renamed device pmd patch up later today. Excellent. Thanks -- Thomas
