2014-10-22 19:53, Helin Zhang:
> +#define RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64 (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(uint64_t))

How can it be different of 64?
Using 64 would be simpler to understand than RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64.

> +     uint8_t reta[RTE_BIT_WIDTH_64]; /**< 64 redirection table entries. */

Even your comment is saying that it's 64.

-- 
Thomas

Reply via email to