> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, Pablo > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 5:00 PM > To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue > pairs to 2 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.go...@nxp.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:40 AM > > To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara > > Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> > > Cc: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs > > to 2 > > > > Hi Hemant, > > On 4/20/2018 3:53 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hi Hemant/Nipun > > >> On 4/19/2018 10:22 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > >>> From: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > > >>> --- > > >>> drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h | 2 +- > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> index 1433595..5b25aa1 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct dpaa_sec_qp { > > >>> int tx_errs; > > >>> }; > > >>> > > >>> -#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 1 > > >>> +#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 2 > > >>> #define RTE_DPAA_MAX_RX_QUEUE > > >> RTE_DPAA_SEC_PMD_MAX_NB_SESSIONS > > >>> #define DPAA_MAX_DEQUEUE_NUM_FRAMES 63 > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Why 2? I think it should be 8. > > >> > > > [Hemant] Ok. Sending v2 > > > > I guess this need some testing whether it will break the existing use cases > > or > not. > > > > Pablo, > > > > I recommend, it would be good if you can apply the other 3 patches in > > this series in RC1. This patch should be hold back for RC2. > > Good to me.
Any update on this? > Thanks, > Pablo > > > > > Thanks, > > Akhil
