> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 6:19 PM
> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <[email protected]>
> Cc: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Vangati, Narender <[email protected]>; Rao, Nikhil
> <[email protected]>; Eads, Gage <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v3,1/5] eventdev: introduce event crypto adapter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 07:34:52 +0000
> > From: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <[email protected]>
> > To: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>, Jerin Jacob
> > <[email protected]>
> > CC: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
> "[email protected]"
> >  <[email protected]>, "Vangati, Narender" <[email protected]>,
> > "Rao,  Nikhil" <[email protected]>, "Eads, Gage"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [v3,1/5] eventdev: introduce event crypto
> > adapter
> >
> > Hi Akhil,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback on the diagram. My thoughts are also in line with
> diagram.
> > In fact, my diagram also depicts same. The only difference is that, you have
> shown application in a separate block.
> > The "crypto stage + enqueue to cryptodev" block itself is part of an
> application.
> > So, for more clarity, I will add "application" as additional text to the 
> > block.
> > With the limited time, changing diagram needs change in SVG file as well.
> > In case, if you still feel there a change required we can take it up later.
> 
> IMO, At least in the header file you can copy the proposed and agreed diagram.
> if you don't have time then documentation patch we can fix it just after the
> initial patch and worst case apply the documentation patch after RC3.
Sure Jerin.

Regards
Abhinandan

Reply via email to