On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>

[..]
+       for (idx = 0; idx < RTE_HEAP_NUM_FREELISTS; idx++) {
+               for (elem = LIST_FIRST(&heap->free_head[idx]);
+                               !!elem; elem = LIST_NEXT(elem, free_list)) {

Why the double-negation?

Otherwise, see no issues.

Acked-by: Remy Horton <[email protected]>


Reply via email to