On 6/21/2018 1:24 PM, ido goshen wrote:
> Suggested-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: ido goshen <i...@cgstowernetworks.com>
<...>
> +static uint16_t
> +eth_pcap_tx_mux(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> + struct pcap_tx_queue *tx_queue = queue;
> + if (tx_queue->dumper)
> + return eth_pcap_tx_dumper(queue, bufs, nb_pkts);
> + else
> + return eth_pcap_tx(queue, bufs, nb_pkts);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * pcap_open_live wrapper function
> */
> @@ -773,6 +783,31 @@ struct pmd_devargs {
> return open_iface(key, value, extra_args);
> }
>
> +static int
> +open_pcap_rx_mux(const char *key, const char *value, void *extra_args)
> +{
> + struct pmd_devargs *pcaps = extra_args;
Do we need this assignment? Why not pass extra_args directly?
> +
> + if (strcmp(key, ETH_PCAP_RX_PCAP_ARG) == 0)
> + return open_rx_pcap(key, value, pcaps);
> + if (strcmp(key, ETH_PCAP_RX_IFACE_ARG) == 0)
> + return open_rx_iface(key, value, pcaps);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +open_pcap_tx_mux(const char *key, const char *value, void *extra_args)
> +{
> + struct pmd_devargs *dumpers = extra_args;
Do we need this assignment? Why not pass extra_args directly?
> +
> + if (strcmp(key, ETH_PCAP_TX_PCAP_ARG) == 0)
> + return open_tx_pcap(key, value, dumpers);
> + if (strcmp(key, ETH_PCAP_TX_IFACE_ARG) == 0)
> + return open_tx_iface(key, value, dumpers);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> static struct rte_vdev_driver pmd_pcap_drv;
>
> static int
> @@ -873,8 +908,7 @@ struct pmd_devargs {
> eth_from_pcaps(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev,
> struct pmd_devargs *rx_queues, const unsigned int nb_rx_queues,
> struct pmd_devargs *tx_queues, const unsigned int nb_tx_queues,
> - struct rte_kvargs *kvlist, int single_iface,
> - unsigned int using_dumpers)
> + struct rte_kvargs *kvlist, int single_iface)
> {
> struct pmd_internals *internals = NULL;
> struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev = NULL;
> @@ -891,10 +925,7 @@ struct pmd_devargs {
>
> eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = eth_pcap_rx;
>
> - if (using_dumpers)
> - eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = eth_pcap_tx_dumper;
> - else
> - eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = eth_pcap_tx;
> + eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = eth_pcap_tx_mux;
We shouldn't introduce an extra check in data path. Instead of checking "if
(tx_queue->dumper)" for _each_ packet, we should check it here once and assign
proper burst function.
