Hi Jeff

Continue session from last version + more comments\question.

From: Jeff Guo 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 6:36 PM
> To: step...@networkplumber.org; bruce.richard...@intel.com;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; konstantin.anan...@intel.com;
> gaetan.ri...@6wind.com; jingjing...@intel.com; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>; Mordechay Haimovsky <mo...@mellanox.com>;
> Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; harry.van.haa...@intel.com;
> qi.z.zh...@intel.com; shaopeng...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> Cc: jblu...@infradead.org; shreyansh.j...@nxp.com; dev@dpdk.org;
> jia....@intel.com; helin.zh...@intel.com
> Subject: [PATCH V3 4/4] app/testpmd: show example to handle hot unplug
> 
> Use testpmd for example, to show how an application smoothly handle failure
> when device being hot unplug. If app have enabled the device event monitor
> and register the hot plug event’s callback before running, once app detect the
> removal event, the callback would be called. It will first stop the packet
> forwarding, then stop the port, close the port, and finally detach the port to
> remove the device out from the device lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia....@intel.com>
> ---
> v3->v2:
> delete some unused check
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> 24c1998..2ee5621 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -1951,9 +1951,10 @@ eth_dev_event_callback_unregister(void)
>  void
>  attach_port(char *identifier)
>  {
> -     portid_t pi = 0;
>       unsigned int socket_id;
> 
> +     portid_t pi = rte_eth_dev_count_avail();
> +

I don't understand this change... can you explain?

>       printf("Attaching a new port...\n");
> 
>       if (identifier == NULL) {
> @@ -2125,16 +2126,22 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint32_t port_mask)
> static void  rmv_event_callback(void *arg)  {
> +     struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +
>       int need_to_start = 0;
>       int org_no_link_check = no_link_check;
>       portid_t port_id = (intptr_t)arg;
> 
>       RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_RET(port_id);
> +     dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +
> +     printf("removing device %s\n", dev->device->name);
> 
>       if (!test_done && port_is_forwarding(port_id)) {
>               need_to_start = 1;
>               stop_packet_forwarding();
>       }
> +

I don't think you need to change anything in this function.
You can add the print in the caller code.

>       no_link_check = 1;
>       stop_port(port_id);
>       no_link_check = org_no_link_check;

Suggestion for synchronization:
Don't register to ethdev RMV event if EAL hotplug is enabled.

> @@ -2196,6 +2203,9 @@ static void
>  eth_dev_event_callback(char *device_name, enum rte_dev_event_type type,
>                            __rte_unused void *arg)
>  {
> +     uint16_t port_id;
> +     int ret;
> +
>       if (type >= RTE_DEV_EVENT_MAX) {
>               fprintf(stderr, "%s called upon invalid event %d\n",
>                       __func__, type);
> @@ -2206,9 +2216,12 @@ eth_dev_event_callback(char *device_name, enum
> rte_dev_event_type type,
>       case RTE_DEV_EVENT_REMOVE:
>               RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "The device: %s has been removed!\n",
>                       device_name);
> -             /* TODO: After finish failure handle, begin to stop
> -              * packet forward, stop port, close port, detach port.
> -              */
> +             ret = rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(device_name, &port_id);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     printf("can not get port by device %s!\n",
> device_name);
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +             rmv_event_callback((void *)(intptr_t)port_id);
>               break;
>       case RTE_DEV_EVENT_ADD:
>               RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "The device: %s has been added!\n", @@ -
> 2736,7 +2749,6 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
>                       return -1;
>               }
>               eth_dev_event_callback_register();
> -
>       }
> 
>       if (start_port(RTE_PORT_ALL) != 0)
> --
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to