Hi Anoob, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph, Anoob > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:43 AM > To: Sunil Kumar Kori <[email protected]>; Richardson, Bruce > <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob > <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > <[email protected]> > Cc: Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad > <[email protected]>; Rao, Nikhil > <[email protected]>; Pavan Nikhilesh <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/20] eventdev: add files for eventmode helper > > Hi Sunil, > > On 27-06-2018 11:50, Sunil Kumar Kori wrote: > > External Email > > > > Regards > > Sunil Kumar > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:54 PM > >> To: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob > >> <[email protected]>; Pablo de Lara > >> <[email protected]> > >> Cc: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > >> <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad > >> <[email protected]>; Nikhil Rao > >> <[email protected]>; Pavan Nikhilesh > >> <[email protected]>; Sunil Kumar Kori > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >> Subject: [PATCH 01/20] eventdev: add files for eventmode helper > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile | 2 ++ > >> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper.c | 7 +++++++ > >> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper.h | 6 ++++++ > >> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper_internal.h | 6 ++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper.c > >> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper.h > >> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventmode_helper_internal.h > >> > > Having a separate helper library to configure eventdev may be a overhead to > > the application > > as application needs to understand main DPDK API as well as helper routines. > > It can be kept in application as a separate file. > For one application we could add a new file, but if we are to enable > event mode with multiple applications, wouldn't this be duplication of > lot of code? Considering that I haven't added the required parsing > routines, the code additions in one application to make it eventdriven > would be huge. > > I do agree that making this as a library poses its own challenges, but > do you have something better in mind? Another option we can think of is > making all these changes part of some common headers and then each > application can include and start using these functions. I'm fine with > any approach, but we need to consider making at-least l3fwd & > ipsec-secgw also event driven.
A quick q - does it mean that l3fwd and ipsec-secgw would become event driven only? Or it would be possible to choose (at startup or at build time) between current and new behavior? Konstantin > Thanks, > Anoob
