>-----Original Message-----
>From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: 11 July 2018 19:32
>To: Verma, Shally <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal
><[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila <[email protected]>; Gupta, 
>Ashish <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: add ZLIB PMD documentation
>
>External Email
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shally Verma [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 5:57 PM
>> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>> [email protected]; Sunila Sahu
>> <[email protected]>; Ashish Gupta
>> <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: add ZLIB PMD documentation
>>
>
>Better change title to "add ZLIB PMD guide", to avoid duplication.
>
>> add zlib pmd feature specification and overview documentation
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sunila Sahu <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Shally Verma <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Gupta <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                               |  2 +
>>  doc/guides/compressdevs/features/zlib.ini | 22 ++++++++++
>>  doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst          | 68
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 448bbe1..1c217b0 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -854,6 +854,8 @@ F: doc/guides/compressdevs/features/isal.ini
>>  ZLIB
>>  M: Sunila Sahu <[email protected]>
>>  F: drivers/compress/zlib/
>> +F: doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst
>> +F: doc/guides/compressdevs/features/zlib.ini
>>
>>  Eventdev Drivers
>>  ----------------
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/compressdevs/features/zlib.ini
>> b/doc/guides/compressdevs/features/zlib.ini
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bdc0fc4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/doc/guides/compressdevs/features/zlib.ini
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +;
>> +; Refer to default.ini for the full list of available PMD features.
>> +;
>> +; Supported features of 'ZLIB' compression driver.
>> +;
>> +[Features]
>> +HW Accelerated =
>> +CPU SSE        =
>> +CPU AVX        =
>> +CPU AVX2       =
>> +CPU AVX512     =
>> +CPU NEON       =
>> +Stateful       =
>> +By-Pass        =
>> +Chained mbufs  =
>> +Deflate        = Y
>> +LZS            =
>> +Adler32        =
>> +Crc32          =
>> +Adler32&Crc32  =
>> +Fixed          = Y
>> +Dynamic        = Y
>
>No need to include the features that the PMD does not support
>(plus, some of those names have been changed).
>
You mean remove entry with empty values like >> +Crc32          =

>> diff --git a/doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst
>> b/doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7dd5c74
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst
>
>...
>
>> +
>> +Installation
>> +------------
>> +
>> +* To build DPDK with ZLIB library, the user is required to download the 
>> ``libz``
>
>Zlib?
Library is available with name libz .

Thanks
Shally
>
>> library.
>> +* Use following command for installation.
>> +
>> +*  For Fedora users ::
>> +  yum install zlib-devel
>> +*  For ubuntu users ::
>
>Ubuntu
>
>> +  apt-get install zlib1g-dev
>
>I am seeing a build error because of these lines:
>
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst:41: WARNING: Literal block expected; none 
>found.
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst:41: WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank 
>line; unexpected unindent.
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst:42: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank 
>line; unexpected unindent.
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst:43: WARNING: Literal block expected; none 
>found.
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst:43: WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank 
>line; unexpected unindent.
>doc/guides/compressdevs/zlib.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any 
>toctree
>
>> +
>> +* Once downloaded, the user needs to build the library.
>> +
>> +* make can  be used to install the library on their system, before building
>> DPDK::
>> +
>> +    make
>> +    sudo make install
>
>This is not required for packages in distros. I assume that this is then for 
>building from source code.
>In that case, I think it would be good to differentiate between the two 
>scenarios.
>
>

Reply via email to