Thomas, Sorry for the late reply. DPDK will definitely be supported by IBM. I think Pradeep and the team is working on this. Personally, I don't have enough bandwidth to do this, we'll have a discussion internally to decide who will take over the maintenance.
Thank you! > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: 2018年8月30日 16:37 > To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>; Gowrishankar > Muthukrishnan <gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Chao Zhu > <chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; prad...@us.ibm.com; Alfredo Mendoza > <mendo...@us.ibm.com>; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan > <gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com>; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan > <gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Kevin Reilly <kjrei...@us.ibm.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com; Luca Boccassi > <bl...@debian.org> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type > > 29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt: > > Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all? > > There not even was a "oh yeah, <whatever the content would be>" mail > > by them. > > Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"? > > This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pull > > some strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a reply. > > I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of > > ppc64 maintainance ppc64 by "someone". > > I tend to agree. > > Let's try again: > > Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance? > > SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64? >
