On 9/1/2018 5:32 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> From: Somnath Kotur <[email protected]>
>
> There was no direct association between the rxq's vnic and the vnic_info[].
> Explicitly associate the two in bnxt_mq_rx_configure().
>
> Fixes: f7c3d72afff7 ("net/bnxt: fix Rx ring count limitation")
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <[email protected]>
<...>
> void bnxt_free_vnic_attributes(struct bnxt *bp)
> {
> struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - STAILQ_FOREACH(vnic, &bp->free_vnic_list, next) {
> + for (i = 0; i < bp->nr_vnics; i++) {
> if (vnic->rss_table) {
Here vnic accessed without initial value [1], I guess intention was:
"vnic = &bp->vnic_info[i];" before access.
[1]
.../drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_vnic.c:93:7: error: variable 'vnic' is uninitialized
when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
if (vnic->rss_table) {
^~~~
