Guys, this is an example of what should not be done with emails formatting.
2015-04-16 06:26, Ouyang, Changchun: > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:48 PM > To: Ouyang, Changchun > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: fix ring size negotiation This header is partly useless. > > No warning is needed, it just works. Stephen, please do not top post. It makes harder to find what you are commenting. > > I know it works, but the upper user don?t know the descriptor number is > reduced. > I concern it is not so user-friendly here. Changchun, please be sure the above text is quoted. How are we supposed to understand who is speaking here? All, please, take care of readers. Thanks > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Ouyang, Changchun <changchun.ouyang at > intel.com<mailto:changchun.ouyang at intel.com>> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>] > > On Behalf Of Stephen > > Hemminger > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 11:20 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: fix ring size negotiation > > > > This fixes another of the issues with running virtio on non-KVM > > envirionments. For example, Google Compute Engine reports a ring size of > > 16K. > > > > If guest virtio requests more slots than available then the queue should > > just > > I suspect 'more' here should be 'less'? > > > be initialized to the smaller value. > > > > Conversely, if the number of descriptors requested exceeds the virtio host > > queue size, then just silently use the smaller host size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at > > networkplumber.org<mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org>> > > --- > > lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > index 3cb9c6a..db0232e 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > @@ -267,13 +267,21 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev > > *dev, > > if (vq_size == 0) { > > PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "%s: virtqueue does not exist", > > __func__); > > return -EINVAL; > > - } else if (!rte_is_power_of_2(vq_size)) { > > + } > > + > > + if (!rte_is_power_of_2(vq_size)) { > > PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "%s: virtqueue size is not powerof 2", > > __func__); > > return -EINVAL; > > - } else if (nb_desc != vq_size) { > > - PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Warning: nb_desc(%d) is not equal to > > vq size (%d), fall to vq size", > > - nb_desc, vq_size); > > - nb_desc = vq_size; > > + } > > + > > + if (nb_desc < vq_size) { > > + if (!rte_is_power_of_2(nb_desc)) { > > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, > > + "nb_desc(%u) size is not powerof 2", > > + nb_desc); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + vq_size = nb_desc; > Don't we need a warning when nb_desc > vq_size? > > > } > > > > if (queue_type == VTNET_RQ) { > > -- > > 2.1.4 > >