On 04/15/15 23:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> With GCC 4.4.7 from CentOS 6.5, the following errors arise:
>
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c: In function ?ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup?:
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:2509: error: missing initializer
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:2509: error: (near initialization for 
> ?dev_info.driver_name?)
>
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c: In function ?ixgbe_set_rsc?:
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:4072: error: missing initializer
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:4072: error: (near initialization for 
> ?dev_info.driver_name?)
>
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c: In function 
> ?ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc?:
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:1479: error: ?next_rsc_entry? may be used 
> uninitialized in this function
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:1480: error: ?next_rxe? may be used 
> uninitialized in this function
>
> The "missing initializer" warning is a GCC bug which seems fixed in 4.7.
> The "may be used uninitialized" warning seems to be another GCC bug and is
> workarounded with NULL initialization.
>
> Fixes: 8eecb3295aed ("ixgbe: add LRO support")
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> - option -Wno-missing-field-initializers for old GCC instead of code 
> workaround
>
>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 ++--
>   mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk      | 5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c 
> b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index f1da9ec..6475c44 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -1476,8 +1476,8 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf 
> **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts,
>               bool eop;
>               struct ixgbe_rx_entry *rxe;
>               struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *rsc_entry;
> -             struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *next_rsc_entry;
> -             struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe;
> +             struct ixgbe_rsc_entry *next_rsc_entry = NULL;
> +             struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe = NULL;

-Wno-maybe-uninitialized ?

>               struct rte_mbuf *first_seg;
>               struct rte_mbuf *rxm;
>               struct rte_mbuf *nmb;
> diff --git a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> index 88f235c..208cddd 100644
> --- a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> +++ b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> @@ -80,5 +80,10 @@ WERROR_FLAGS += -Wundef -Wwrite-strings
>   # process cpu flags
>   include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/toolchain/$(RTE_TOOLCHAIN)/rte.toolchain-compat.mk
>   
> +# workaround GCC bug with warning "missing initializer" for "= {0}"
> +ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 47 && echo 1), 1)
> +WERROR_FLAGS += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
> +endif
> +
>   export CC AS AR LD OBJCOPY OBJDUMP STRIP READELF
>   export TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS TOOLCHAIN_LDFLAGS TOOLCHAIN_ASFLAGS

Reply via email to